Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The end is near and the beginning is close!

Looking back at the chapters of my life that make up my career as an ELT, entering the STG program to pursue a master's degree in TESOL was the largest turning point in my professional life. However, this would never have been possible if I hadn't taken the first step of moving to Korea. Johnston talks about having to make the momentous decision of moving his family to the states from Poland and that he was putting so much distance between his wife and her family, and the issue of moving their three young children. Disrupting the coziness (I'm assuming) that his family had established in Poland, for the pursuit of his doctoral studies. Looking at the opposing values that came with making this decision. In my case, I didn't have to weigh such moral dilemmas about family distance, but selling all my belongings and moving to Korea to pursue a teaching career was pretty high on the chart for me. This move though was the start of my journey of professional development in the field of ELT that has led me to the point that I'm at today, which is the pursuit of my master's degree in TESOL. This new passion and hunger for academic knowledge is something I am not accustomed to. When I had first attended university, I was definitely not there for the scholarly aspect as much as the partying and moving away from the parent. However, this time around it's for me, my own personal and pedagogical development as a professional teacher.

The core value that has guided me to this new chapter in my life is that of finding happiness. From losing my entire family to random diseases, cancers and Alzheimer; it has taught me that life is not something to waste being in a shitty job that you hate. Instead, to wake up and be happy to go to work; knowing that you're making your life into something that has meaning by being able to have an impact on others. This is precisely what has pushed and motivated me to choose the career path that I've chosen.

The biggest conflicts that I've had with my value of happiness have stemmed from previous girlfriends.  It deals largely with the same issue Johnston mentioned with Rafal's materialistic goals, in that my girlfriends were concerned more with money and status over the fact that I loved being a kindergarten teacher working with kids. They always wanted me to become a university professor because it looks better and pays more money. To this I always responded with "I don't care about money" (I do but not like this) and that "I love teaching the little ones." I don't know whether it's a cultural thing, but this concept of happiness doesn't seem to be a value of theirs. These conversations usually ended badly and would start the relationship into a nosedive that never could get straightened out. This being said, I have now reached a point that I'm looking for that career development that Johnston mentioned: changing jobs; taking on different kind of teaching; and returning to school to study for a master's degree.

In my opinion, teachers for the most part, are all marginalized. This be especially prevalent in Korea, since they are strong advocates of the "if you can speak the language, you can teach it" who Phillipson (1992) has labeled the "native speaker fallacy" (pp. 193-199). However, if it weren’t for this native speaker fallacy, like Johnston stated "marginality can in some circumstances lead to opportunity", I would've never gotten my first teaching position in Korea, that subsequently set me on the path to a master's degree (HOPEFULLY if I get into the program). Looking at my school in regards to this issue of marginality, I feel that I am marginalized in the sense that the native speaker fallacy is prevalent, but since I have been at this school for almost three years now, I have established my worth that I am not like other teachers and it's reflected in my yearly request/demand for a raise, which they have begrudgingly given me twice now.

For me, I don't think that there are any forms of advocacy that would or has been useful for me in my ELT career to this point.

Monday, June 2, 2014

Still so much to work on!

Before writing this blog, I thought that I had killed my last micro teaching, however, that would not be the case. I noticed two significant issues from my video: 1) my evaluative teacher talk; and 2) the non-authentic student interaction.
At the beginning of this program, we looked at the T-Initiated IRF and its effects. For the feedback stage, there were two ways that a teacher could handle this stage by either giving the student a communicative or evaluative response. Where communicative is for scaffolding towards independent student functioning and the latter is just for highlighting their errors and close the exchange. From my MT, I counted nineteen different times that I told a student 'very good'. Using this primarily as a segue word to move the conversation forward. The student had answered the question, but in no way was it 'praise' worthy. Since reading Kohn's "The Risk of Rewards" in SLA, it has really forced me to think twice about giving praise to students and the ways it can demotivate them. I have to find a way of moving the discourse along through other means that's not praising or evaluative.

This being said... I am having a giant problem with figuring out how I can go about doing this without it being one of the two. Any help would be strongly appreciated! 

The second thing that I had noticed in the MT video was how unauthentic I made the student interaction. In class, we discussed about trying to create classroom discourse to resemble an actual conversation we would have outside of class. I need to realize this when I'm getting the students to interact with one another. An example of this would be when Kevan asked DeeDee, "Whose bedroom do you think it is?" This question had previously been asked, so I should have had him ask, "What do you think?” since that would better represent authentic discourse between native speakers. I another aspect in creating authentic discourse, which I haven’t ever addressed in my classes, is the use of 'stress' when talking. A way to introduce this would be the rubber band technique we went over in class. Adding this fun element to everyday classroom interaction will help students in understanding the flow of conversations. Also, from watching my video, it can give doing a tedious conversation task a little extra flavor for individuals that are tired of being in class for 8 hours.